Just over a third (38 percent) of Republicans are satisfied with Donald Trump as the Republican presidential nominee. How will they respond in November? Will they turn out in full force to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House? Will some sit out the election? The Republican Party needs a big turn-out. Even if they don’t want Trump as president, they do want lots of Republicans to vote for all the other candidates down ballot. The Republicans seem likely to retain control of the House, but control of the Senate doesn’t seem to be a lock. Then there are all the state and local races. How to get Republicans to turn out in large numbers?
There are two answers. First, Clinton is deeply unpopular with all Republicans (and many Independents). Keeping Clinton out of the White House probably will overshadow putting Trump into the White House as a Republican campaign theme. This is going to get very ugly, even by current standards. The foolish Benghazi investigation has been done to death. However, F.B.I. Director James Comey’s brutally honest assessment of her e-mail issue hurt her on the competence argument that she wants to make against Trump. Polls run after Comey’s press conference reported a 5 point fall in her favorability rating and a 7 point fall in her honesty and trustworthiness ratings. This is worth pondering. The honesty and trustworthy score fell more than the favorability score. Some 2 percent of the respondents think worse of her as a person, but still prefer her as the candidate. That’s because Trump is the rival candidate. However, it also shows that personal attacks can drive down her favorability rate.
Clinton has provided a lot to work with here. Both the Clinton Foundation and her post-Secretary of State speeches are still ripe for the plucking. It should come as no surprise if the Republican rage-generators use these topics as a device to portray Clinton as an influence-peddler, or bribe-taker, or even extortionist. This could end in a scorched-earth campaign founded on fanning the flames of personal animus. The day after the election, Americans are going to wake up to a legacy of ill-feeling and failure to address real issues.
Second, Republicans have already begun to sell themselves on the idea that a President Trump could be “managed” by Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan. Solid Republican majorities in the House and Senate would give them control over the Trump administration’s legislative agenda. In this view, Trump really is just an empty suit who wants to fly around on Air Force One and tell the U.N. to its face where it can get off. There is a large measure of self-delusion in this view. Trump is a guy from New York City. Regardless of anything he has said so far, he probably doesn’t believe in a “right to life”; probably isn’t any more homophobic than most Americans (Republican or Democrat); and isn’t a racist just because he takes a really hard line on both illegal immigration and immigration from Muslim countries “compromised” by Islamist terrorism. “Because the New York Times says so” isn’t much of an argument. A guy who has used corporate bankruptcy to force his creditors to write down a lot of debt isn’t going to feel that McConnell and Ryan have got him over a barrel once he becomes President. What is a Republican Senate going to do if Trump nominates Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court?
 “Poll Watch,” The Week, 29 July 2016, p. 17.
 Probably there will be a lot of work for Trump-wranglers to keep him from saying or doing something that makes her seem the less-repellant candidate.
 “Clinton: a wounded candidate,” The Week, 29 July 2016.
 There is a certain passing similarity to Democrats’ personality-based attacks on Richard Nixon throughout his career. None of that did America any good.
 See the column by NYT Public Editor Liz Spayd, “Why Readers See The Times as Liberal,” NYT, 24 July 2016.