While a majority of Republicans once believed that fair-play meant that the Republican convention should nominate the candidate who had won the most votes in the primaries, a majority (54 percent) of Republicans now wish that the party had not chosen Donald Trump as the candidate. About a third (35 percent) believes that Trump was the best choice available. Obviously, the latter figure doesn’t mean Trump alone. It may be more of a statement about the Republican candidates who ran against Trump. The Democrats aren’t in much better shape about Hillary Clinton. Almost half (47 percent) of those who plan to vote for her will do so chiefly to keep Donald Trump out of the White House. Scarcely a third (32 percent) are actually pro-Clinton. More broadly, two thirds (66 percent) of all voters believe that HRC is dishonest, while less than a third (29 percent) believe that she is not dishonest. Again obviously, the “Hillary is dishonest” camp includes every single Republican and a bunch of Independents. Amidst the Viking funeral of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, people should attend to the recent poll reporting that 74 percent of Trump’s supporters think that Hillary Clinton should be in prison. How deeply that view has penetrated the minds of ordinary Democrats is unknown.
This could have consequences for the 2016 presidential election. A lot of people will vote for Hillary Clinton in order to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.
Unless, perhaps, they think that she is crooked. “Crooked Hillary” has become a standard phrase in the speeches of Donald Trump. This charge arises from Trump’s abrasive discourse and datcourse. However, it gains traction from the perception that Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation engaged in unseemly practices during her time as Secretary of State. The release of several documents from the investigation of Clinton by the EffaBeeEye has poured gasoline on this particular fire.
Earlier reports indicated that HRC’s e-mail had probably been compromised. Trump invited the Russians to reveal what they had learned from the 30,000-plus “personal” e-mails that Clinton had ordered deleted from her private server. Some people misconstrued this as an invitation to “hack” her private server. The server seems to have been shut-down long ago, so it cannot now be hacked. Trump’s hope seems to be that the Russians will reveal damaging information about Clinton’s private dealings with donors to the Clinton Foundation while she served as Secretary of State.
It seems reasonable to expect such “revelations.” There is a lot of bad blood between Clinton and the Russian soon-to-be-tsar Vladimir Putin. While serving as Secretary of State, Clinton challenged Putin’s authority in a country where being on the wrong side of the government can get you killed. In early 2011, she, among others, deceived the Russians about American intentions in Libya. In December 2011, she described Russian elections as plagued by “electoral fraud.” If the Russkies have incriminating evidence, they may dump it.
Now the New York Times seems to be lighting “back-fires” in preparation for an “October surprise.”
 “Poll Watch,” The Week, 12 August 2016, p. 18.
 “Poll Watch,” The Week, 9 September 2016, p.17.
 Neil MacFarquhar, “A Powerful Russian Weapon: The Spread of False Stories,” NYT, 28 August 2016; Jo Becker, Steven Erlanger, and Eric Schmitt, “How Russia Often Benefits When Julian Assange Reveals the West’s Secrets,” NYT, 31 August 2016.