It is now commonly accepted that the United States (US) and the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) are strategic competitors. All eyes regard this competition, for they represent two different approaches to government and economic management. China combines an effective authoritarian government with state-managed semi-capitalism. The US combines democracy with a regulated free market. For the duration of the “Fifty Years War” the United States represented the preferred wave of the future for an ever-growing share of the world’s population. Is the US able to win a new competition or have essential elements of its previous strength dissolved? Is China better able than were Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union to win a competition with the US? It depends where you look.
Does the Covid 19 pandemic of 2020 offer any insight into the relative positions of the US and the PRC? The answer must be NO if examined in international perspective. Democratic Taiwan did better than the PRC; the United Kingdom did even worse than did the US in spite of doing all the things that Democrats criticized the Trump administration for not doing. The explanation for the diversity of results may have something to do with an Asian culture of compliance with the public interest in comparison with a Western culture of asserting individual rights at the expense of the community.
It is sad, but true that the Covid pandemic is a transitory event. It has been deadly and disruptive in its impact, but in a year it will be history. More fundamental issues should be alarming. So far, China has won the trade war launched by President Trump. During 2020 its trade surplus increased, as did the trade deficit of the US. The Trump administration’s attack on Huawei Technologies led the PRC to pour resources into its semi-conductor industry. American efforts to get other countries to join in exerting pressure on China signally failed. European, South American, and Asian countries are so entranced by the promise of the China market that they seek to fill the gaps when other countries try to pressure China. Nor is American politics oriented toward pursuing a coherent industrial policy during peacetime. One of Trump’s last acts as President was to see his efforts to encourage an American rival to Huawei come to grief. Intel announced plans to offshore some of its chip production; while Cisco rejected government entreaties to buy either Nokia or Ericsson. Here they put the bottom line ahead of national strategy. One of Biden’s first acts as President was to cancel the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. Here he put the demands of environmentalists over the interests of America’s Canadian ally (and over those of the American construction workers who had been building the pipeline).
Finally, Chinese news media are portraying the riot at the Capitol as proof that American democracy is crumbling. Many, here and abroad, would agree with this grim judgement.
 Greg Ip, “China Played Its Hand Well in 2020. Will It Keep Winning?” WSJ, 23-24 January 2021.
 I’m not sure how Francis Fukuyama makes sense of this development. Apparently, Hegelianism only takes you so far. See Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man Standing (1992). Still, he’s teaching at Chicago and I’m working at an educational wide spot in the road. So,…
 The struggle from 1940 to 1990 between capitalist liberal democracy and autarkic dictatorships.
 For example, the European Union recently concluded an agreement with China to increase investment. In doing so, they ignored a suggestion from Jake Sullivan, then President Biden’s national security advisor-designate that they should wait.