When I’m in Easton, Pennsylvania on weekends, I take the dog for a walk. He’s intrepid, so sometimes we go down to “The Circle.” From there up Northampton Avenue, there’s a lot of public assistance housing. Nice—if unhealthy-looking—people to talk to on a Sunday morning.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) estimates that 550,000 people are “homeless” in America. Geographically, the homeless are not evenly distributed. About 25 percent (137,000) live in California, which has about 12 percent of the nation’s population. Another 65,000 people (or about 6 percent) live in New York City. Even within California, the homeless are not evenly distributed. About 45 percent (59,000 out of 137,000) live in the Los Angeles area, while 8,000 live in San Francisco. However, the homeless population in Los Angeles has grown by 12 percent since 2018 and the homeless population in San Francisco has grown by 17 percent since 2017.
Economists point to a steep rise in prices for a limited housing stock in California. Since 2013, the median rent in Los Angeles rose almost three times faster than did median income. Now, one-third of renters pay at least half their monthly income for housing. What is implied is that the “marginal” people get forced out of whatever ramshackle accommodations (called “flop-houses” in a less-enlightened time) they have found by rising property values/rents.
Substance abuse is a major contributor to homelessness and other things. Among the Seattle’s homeless, for example, an estimated 80 percent have drug or alcohol problems.
Apparently, the “homeless” don’t want to be in city-provided “homes.” New York City—with the abominable winter and summer climates (and delightful springs and falls) of the Mid-Atlantic states–provides shelter accommodation for 61,000 people, about 95 percent of its approximately 65,000 homeless population. In contrast, Los Angeles—which has a temperate climate—has only 25 percent of its homeless population in shelters. Building shelters or low-income housing may not appeal to the homeless. Freeway underpasses are good enough for them. Perhaps, what they’re after—other than getting high—isn’t offered by America?
Do cities entice homeless people to move there? In 2007, Los Angeles announced that the city would no longer enforce a law against sleeping on the sidewalk in the 50-block “Skid Row” area. Perhaps 10,000 people now live there. So, IDK.
 “Living on the Streets,” The Week, 9 August 2019, p. 11. How many of them are illegal immigrants or “asylum-seekers” from Central America? My money would be on none. If I am correct, that might—or might not—say something about the nature of the problem.
 67 percent v. 23 percent.
 In areas around Boston in the 1980s, rents were high. Low-income graduate students had to scramble. I shared a one-bedroom apartment with a South Korean couple; I shared a two bedroom house in Somerville with another graduate student; and then I shared a three bedroom apartment above Oak Square with two other friends. My then-future wife shared an apartment with a couple of friends, then moved to a big group house. So, being “poor” doesn’t have to mean being “homeless.” None of this has anything to do with the actual homeless. “Homeless” people aren’t grad students. My question is what “life-style” do the poor have a right to expect? This is a poorly-articulated political dispute between Democrats and Republicans. Part of the problem seems to be that Republicans admit that society isn’t fair, but believe that human ability can overcome those problems, while Democrats claim that society is so unfair that no amount of human ability can overcome these barriers. IDK where I stand on this exactly. Just being a jerk here, I realize.