Unable to leave well enough alone, the Republican Senate leaders made yet another attempt to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act. Without having any commonly-agreed plan, they managed to get a formal debate started. First, the Senate voted down a broad plan to repeal and replace. Then it voted down a plan to repeal and give Congress two year to replace it with something else. Then it voted down a “skinny repeal” that just got rid of the mandate. Despite its flaws, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) helps—as well as vexes—many lower income Americans of both parties. Opinion polls since the election have tended to show broad support for preservation of universal health insurance. With a narrow 52-48 majority in the Senate, the Republican leadership cannot force through any legislation that would alienate more than two Republican senators. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine) come from states that may have a substantial number of people who want to vote Republican, but who also live in marginal economic circumstances. Their opposition alone isn’t enough to block “repeal and replace”: Vice President Pence can cast the tie breaker. However, one more Republican dissident—like John McCain—and the measure loses. In either case, Murkowski and Collins get covered for the next election for having done the right thing. So, the question becomes: how to fix the problems with the ACA, rather than trying to roll it back?
Donald Trump campaigned against the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), calling it “the worst trade deal maybe ever signed anywhere.” Once elected, he insisted on a renegotiation of the agreement. This immediately became engulfed in the hysteria following Trump’s surprise election. It also drew heat from Trump’s highly public spat with the president of Mexico. Nevertheless, Mexico and Canada agreed to engage in a re-negotiation of NAFTA. The negotiations are scheduled to begin on 16 August 2017. Now the government has released a statement of its objectives for the negotiations. Contrary to the worst fears of the immediate post-election Trump hysterics, the American objectives are solidly “mainstream ideas for furthering trade liberalization.” Generally speaking, NAFTA trade benefits the American economy even though it is often seen as the source of job-loss. Reality proved more compelling than rhetoric. Perhaps Trump and the Senate leadership should let Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross (who oversees the NAFTA negotiations) run health-care reform?
Six months into his first term, President Trump began a major churning of his staff. Sean Spicer had the reputation for being a decent guy. Then he took the job as White House Press Secretary. Six months of humiliating Hell followed. Then, President Trump concluded that his image problems sprang from poor representation. He hired Anthony Scaramucci as communications director. Spicer promptly resigned. Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, Trump’s direct connection to mainstream Republicans, then got the heave.
Donald Trump governing as a non-party mediator still has—theoretical—potential.
 “Senate Republicans grapple with Obamacare repeal,” The Week, 4 August 2017, p. 7.
 The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that ending the mandate would leave 15 million more people without insurance. This can be taken as an official measure of the number of people who buy insurance under duress. It can be added to whatever number just don’t buy it regardless of the mandate to get a total number of people who are opposed to the mandate. On the other hand, it can be subtracted from the numbers of those estimated by the CBO to be left without insurance issued on other versions of “repeal and replace.”
 “Issue of the week: A softer U.S. line on NAFTA,” The Week, 4 August 2017, p. 42.
 Scaramucci deleted Twitter posts in favor of gun control, action on climate change,, legal abortions, and ending use of the death penalty. “Noted,” The Week, 4 August 2017, p. 18.
 “White House: Spicer’s out, “The Mooch” is in,” The Week, 4 August 2017, p. 18.